Karl Dahlke <[email protected]> writes: > So I'm thinking instead, why don't we create our own IDs. > Just a sequence number that we put on every object we care about, and an > array to map back from sequence number to the object. > A bit of overhead, but no crashes if we accidentally reference an object that > is gone, and no ambiguity - one object per id.
I like this. It is the safe approach. How will objects in the object ID mapping table be freed? -- Chris _______________________________________________ Edbrowse-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
