Quoted text is from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ungsemi.co.uk>, by Michael Pokraka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Enter 800lb gorilla, requesting control version D.97A with following
>structure..... blah-di-blah.To correct that would be interesting, as we're
>now talking about different CONTRL messages per partner - is that the norm?
>('scuse the ignorance, first time setting up EDIFATC Ack's)
The normal rule applies; if G. O'Rilla(800) PLC requests something then
you do what they require and ignore any academic nonsense to the
contrary which may be in EDIFACT specifications.
In Europe the CONTRL message is seldom implemented, and there is thus
little accepted practice to draw on. The codes used in element 0085 in
UCI and UCM seem especially idiosyncratic (UCM may not even be required
or mandated at all). You are correct in assuming that partner profiling
for CONTRL might be required although I would have hoped that, within
any sector, some praxis would have emerged.
Regards
Chris
--
Chris Johnson +44 (0)20 8501 1490 (home)
EDIMatrix Ltd +44 (0)20 8559 2454 (work)
+44 (0)20 8559 2497 (fax)
http://www.edimatrix.co.uk
=======================================================================
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
