> From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:16 PM > To: 'EDI-L Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Now the Army is looking at CICA. > > > I think it's really a stretch to conclude that the Army has > made the decision to adopt CICA based on this briefing from > LMI. I would suggest that those interested carefully read > slides 31-39. LMI nowhere in this briefing > **recommends** CICA; rather, on the referenced slides you'll > find what seems to me to be a fairly balanced assessment with > pros and cons. > > Rachel
Exactly. We actually recommend against using CICA as Army and the other agencies are becoming more and more involved in coalition endeavors. The last thing we need to worry about in fighting a war is if we can create interfaces between north American standards and 'rest of the world' message standards. Mark Mark R. Crawford Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components LMI Government Consulting 2000 Corporate Ridge McLean, VA 22102-7805 703.917.7177 Phone 703.655.4810 Wireless The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater. www.lmi.org > > > > > Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd. > > 39432 North Avenue > > Beach Park, IL 60099 > > Voice: 847-872-8070 > > Fax: 847-589-8081 > > > _____ > > From: Hurd, Richard [SLCUS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 4:47 PM > To: EDI-L Mailing List > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Now the Army is looking at CICA. > > > Immediate term?? > > I am having trouble accessing it past Page 37, but the only date I saw > wrapped around CICA was 2008-2015. > > I do agree that they seem to be likin' it. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:31 PM > > To: EDI-L Mailing List > > Subject: [EDI-L] Now the Army is looking at CICA. > > > > > > > > Joe, don't get hung up on trivialities. This is serious e-business. > > Always keep focused on the big picture. > > > > While surfing the 'Net, I came across the Army DLMS > Migration Strategy > > Brief (Sep 04) at > http://www.army.mil/aeioo/Logistics/references.html. > > This is a presentation given by LMI, probably by Mark > > Crawford himself. > > From a cursory glance, it appears that CICA, not UBL, has > > been selected > > as the standard to implement in the immediate term. What's > > the meaning > > of this? CICA got mentioned. Are you happy, Mike? > > > > But at least another 800 lb gorilla sees the wisdom of implementing > > XML. > > > > William J. Kammerer > > Novannet, LLC. > > Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA > > +1 (614) 487-0320 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Joe McVerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2005 08:54 AM > > Subject: [EDI-L] Re: The U.S. Navy is adopting OASIS UBL Naming and > > Design Rules based on ebXML C > > > > > > Not to pick on the gorilla but I must ask - > > > > Were the last three pages of the DON document produced using a > > typewriter, white-out and a scanner? > > > > Joe McVerry > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "William J. Kammerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "EDI-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, 24 January, 2005 07:11 PM > > Subject: [EDI-L] The U.S. Navy is adopting OASIS UBL Naming > and Design > > Rules based on ebXML CCTS (ISO 15000-5) > > > > > > > > Just off the press: The U.S. Navy is adopting OASIS UBL Naming and > > Design Rules based on ebXML CCTS (ISO 15000-5); see > > http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-dev/200501/msg00021.html > . The PDF > cover page and Memo attachment is available to be downloaded from this > page; it must be opened with Adobe Acrobat even though it is saved in > the archives with a .bin suffix. > > Now that everyone who counts is on board, how much longer do you folks > think you can focus on only X12? Especially when 800 lb. government > gorillas like the Navy and GSA have committed to XML?Even the U.S. > government is adopting *international* standards. > > William J. Kammerer > Novannet, LLC. > Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA > +1 (614) 487-0320 > > > > > . > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > . > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L > > > > > _____ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! > Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > . > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject > prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > . Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
