At 05:24 PM 2/15/2005 -0500, Ruben Zagagi wrote <snipped>: >X12C is working together with X12N to produce implementation guides for the >997 and 999, and to recommend against using the 997 when responding to an >implementation guide. While it does not help someone responding to a >transaction set (e.g. 850 to/from Walmart), it should be very helpful to >anyone using an implementation guide or TR3 in any industry (healthcare is >not the only industry developing TR3's).
Assuming Walmart would accept a 999, I don't see any reason why you couldn't use one to respond to their implementation of an 850. >Keep in mind, as of now limitations of both 997 and 999 include the >inability to reject part of a transaction set. And my hunch is that this will likely remain the case in perpetuity. --------------------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting www.rawlinsecconsulting.com Using XML with Legacy Business Applications (Addison-Wesley, 2003) www.awprofessional.com/titles/0321154940 . Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
