> This long time GENTRAN:Server analyst is learning a new tool: the translator
> formerly known as Mercator, Data Stage Tx.
>
> Anyway, what do you all think about Commerce Manager? It seems to be the
> equivalent of GENTRAN:Server's TP administration feature, correct? Are there
> substitute, or alternatives to Commerce Manager which a shop can use with
> Data Stage Tx?

Although I've used Mercator/Datastage since about 1996, I've never used the 
portions of the product designed for 'flow control'
(i..e., the "Commerce Manager" parts).  Probably because those parts didn't 
exist when I started with Mercator, I've always used
"something else" to control firing off maps and/or running multiple-map 
applications. (I use both "RUN" and MS-DOS batch files to
execute maps from the command prompt  -  a lot). So... the answer to this 
question is "Yes, you can use something other than
Commerce Manager to control events/map execution/etc."

>  in GENTRAN:Server, one may mark and discard unused standard
> segments/elements (best for outbound parterships) for ease of viewing. With
> Data Stage Tx, the entire standard needs to be present, correct?

No, you can customize your type trees all you want. If a map is required to 
process, say, only any  "850 Purchase Order" or "810
Invoice" transactions found in the input, no reason you can't create a 
'minimal' tree which supports detail only for those specific
transaction sets. The problem is, it would take close to forever to identify 
and eliminate all the unused segments and elements from
the trees, and even if you did do that, you end up saving not a whole lot of 
anything, anyway.

(You do realize the type tree files are not used at runtime, right? They are 
only required to be present when the map is compiled.
It might help to think of a type tree as a "copy library" the same as you'd use 
a copy library when developing software in some 3GL
language like COBOL, PL/1 or BASIC)..

But the only times I've created such "custom" trees are when partners insist on 
sending non-ansi-compliant transactions (and yes,
this has occurred more than once).  Better IMO to just use the 'factory' ANSI 
trees (which you have marked as 'read only.' You don't
want to tinker with those, even accidentally).

Michael Mattias
Tal Systems, Inc.
Racine WI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.talsystems.com











.  
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to