Allen, I've used WM for RosettaNet PIP processing and looked at it for EDI. At the time, back in 2001-2, the company I worked for used Gentran:Server for NT and we could not find any significant reasons to migrate EDI to WM. The only reason I could see was to support our electronic trading partners on 1 platform rather than 2.
>From my experience, I agree with both Dawn and Ron. The EDI package provided by WebMethods was immature but functional. Saying that, if you have other reasons for using WebMethods besides EDI, I found it a very strong tool that allows for overall more functionality than any of the true EDI software packages I have used. Brian Linde Gas LLC --- In [email protected], Allen Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is anyone using WebMethods for EDI? Are there any benefits over a "True" translator? Any downfalls like have been found with BizTalk? Does it do what is is advertised to do? > > Allen Hoffman > > > Allen Hoffman > www.ediguyconsulting.com > 917-544-0019 > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/OIFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> . Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
