Hi, Does anyone have experience with both of these (or either)? We are a Gentran Unix site, with plans to (eventually, maybe later this year) migrate our EDI to GIS, but we need to roll out AS2 now. Is it going to be faster to implement and easier to maintain AS2 using Cleo? Once we are on GIS is there a compelling reason to then implement the GIS AS2 instead of continuing to use Cleo? What about FTP/FTP-S? Which is easier/faster to get going with, and more maintainable? I guess underlying the above is the assumption that you wish to implement this with available in house resources and not have a requirement to use consultants to get this going (i.e. we are cheap, but want reliable results). Thank you. Ken
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] . Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
