Allow me to suggest that finding someone who knows your exact system/toolkit is not necessarily going to mean a small learning curve. I have worked with people who "knew" the tool being used from previous positions and had worked with it for many years. However, they couldn't adapt to a new business process nor to a different industry.
Also, I've known people who supposedly knew the tool and the industry, but just didn't bother to do any work, although they sold themselves well in the interview. Others who knew the tool, but had no idea how to gather requirements or even interpret guidelines, they had to be told EXACTLY what to do, that made more work for the rest of us, not less. Bottom line, I now look for people whose resumes show flexibility, variety and evidence of learning ability. I learned this the hard way, maybe you can avoid that mistake. Second piece of advice, ask the question you really want answered instead of posing a hypothetical, you'll get better answers. Good Luck, Leah ________________________________ From: tbergmann1 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:09 PM Subject: [EDI-L] Re: GIS and SI I apologize for the tardiness, but thank you all for your comments. I am essentially trying to figure out if I hire someone who has GIS experience, the shift to SI will be minimal. Unfortunately we can't afford a big learning curve so I have to minimize my vulnerability. But it does sound like it won't be too bad. --- In [email protected], Samantha Scott <mossmuncher@...> wrote: > > When we went from GIS to SI I hardly noticed the difference, operationally. > All my old stuff worked. Adapters get improved and deprecated as one would > expect. Its always good to know which ones you are using and read the update > notes carefully. I have been updating all the xpath to the more specific > reference as preferred by SI: string(/ProcessData/ParticularNode) rather > than //ParticularNode/text() but the old way continues to work in the > meantime. > > My biggest piece of advice is never upgrade...always do a fresh install on a > new server instance, migrate all your prod to it (test extensively) and then > make it prod when you take down the old instance and copy prod for your new > test environment. With the latest versions of SI as administered by IBM that > is your only option now anyway. Good choice...upgrades were twice the work > and 3 times the hassle going forward. > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:29 PM, tbergmann1 wrote: > > > Hello folks. I would like to pick your brains regarding Sterling's GIS and > > Sterling Integrator. Essentially what I would like to know is if someone is > > very knowledgeable about GIS but has never used SI, how big of a learning > > curve would you think there would be? Based on what I know about both > > (which, admittedly is little), I would suspect it's not too big a learning > > curve, but I'd rather hear from someone who has used both. > > > > Thanks for all your help and happy Friday! > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
