Great idea but very difficult to do. I have been working with RFID which has the same issues of standardization. It is very time consuming to develop standards and it doesn't guarantee compatibility between manufacturers of RFID tags and readers.
David Frenkel ________________________________ From: Todd Gould <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 9:33 AM Subject: [EDI-L] <TECH> Canonical EDI: Standardizing the Standard for the 99% A Mike Dietzen post on LinkedIn EDI Professionals Worldwide called “Can we as professionals agree to a new way of doing EDI?” led to a discussion on Canonical EDI, something we have discussed at length at Loren Data. I’ve elaborated on my blog http://www.ld.com/canonical-edi-standardizing-the-standard-for-the-99/. Regards, Todd Gould President Loren Data Corp. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
