On 2015-07-23 12:36:34, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 11:50 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > > I think EFIAPI is probably about as old as EFI. Maybe Andrew would > > know. But, aside from its age, there is the fact that the UEFI spec > > has EFIAPI on all public interfaces. > > > > In EDK II, we also use it at library and assembly interface > > boundaries. > > > > I don't think we should try to remove EFIAPI. > > That's fine. We don't have to *remove* it. I'm merely proposing that we > make it a no-op for the GCC builds, just as it is for everyone else. > > Sure, it'll bitrot. But nobody will ever care, because it'll always > just be defined to nothing.
Except if a toolchain comes along that does need to use it. > And it's *already* broken. What is broken? We seem to build many platforms just fine with GCC. -Jordan _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
