On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:53 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: > > UNIXGCC and CYGGCC are GCC 4.3 & mingw based. Did this get tested? > > I think ELFGCC is unused at this point. (And has been since UnixPkg > was deprecated.) > > I think we should deprecate all three of these toolchains. I would > like to see us move them to BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.deprecated. I'll > add Larry to this email, because I think he disagrees with > deprecating > toolchains... > > If you make these changes and it breaks those toolchains, I don't > think we would be able to notice, because I don't think we test them > in our build pool anymore. To me this is all the more reason to move > them out of tools_def.template.
I was building with UNIXGCC last week, to test LLP64 builds without the pain of actually having to deal with Windows. I'd rather see it updated to work with modern MinGW rather than deprecated. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
