what I meant is that git am fails:
Applying: BaseTools/GenFw: remove ARM and RVCT references from ELF64 code
error: patch failed: BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c:360
error: BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 BaseTools/GenFw: remove ARM and RVCT references from
ELF64 code
The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
   /media/Data/repositories/git/efidroid/uefi/edk2/.git/rebase-apply/patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

maybe I did sth. wrong?(I've never used a mailing list patch before). I
downloaded the mbox from gmane:
http://download.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/2036/2037

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On 9 sep. 2015, at 18:10, Michael Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Yes I'm using 32bit ARM :)
> thx for the patches - unfortunatelythe patches fail for me.
>
>
> Did you regenerate Conf/tools_def.txt  and rebuild the BaseTools/ ?
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 9 September 2015 at 17:26, Gao, Liming <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Michael:
>> >   Do you use the linker script BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds and -z
>> common-page-size=4096?
>> >
>>
>> Are you building for 32-bit ARM by any chance? That does not have this
>> feature wired up yet. I posted a v2 of my series that addresses this
>> yesterday.
>>
>>
>>
>> > From: Michael Zimmermann [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 3:22 PM
>> > To: Yao, Jiewen
>> > Cc: Gao, Liming; [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [edk2] Section Alignment of elf binaries compiled with
>> GCC(Linux)
>> >
>> > Unfortunately I missed the replies but I debugged this problem further
>> and the Problem is that GenFw set's the alignment based on "sh_addralign"
>> in the Elf header.
>> >
>> > The 'common-page-size' flag doesn't change the value of this field
>> though. what it does change is the Alignment value of the Program Headers:
>> > Program Headers:
>> >   Type           Offset   VirtAddr   PhysAddr   FileSiz MemSiz  Flg
>> Align
>> >   LOAD           0x010000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x042f8 0x042f8 R E
>> 0x10000
>> >   LOAD           0x0142f8 0x000142f8 0x000142f8 0x000d4 0x000f4 RW
>> 0x10000
>> >   GNU_STACK      0x000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 RWE 0x10
>> > the section alignment still stays at 0/1/4.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > OK
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Gao, Liming
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:48 AM
>> > To: Yao, Jiewen; Michael Zimmermann; [email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> > Subject: RE: [edk2] Section Alignment of elf binaries compiled with
>> GCC(Linux)
>> >
>> > Jiewen:
>> >   The updated message is useful. I suggest to change error level from
>> EFI_D_ERROR to EFI_D_INFO.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Liming
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Yao, Jiewen
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:46 AM
>> > To: Gao, Liming; Michael Zimmermann; [email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> > Subject: RE: [edk2] Section Alignment of elf binaries compiled with
>> GCC(Linux)
>> >
>> > Hi
>> > How about we update debug message like below:
>> >
>> > Index: PropertiesTable.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- PropertiesTable.c   (revision 18191)
>> > +++ PropertiesTable.c   (working copy)
>> > @@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@
>> >
>> >    SetPropertiesTableSectionAlignment (SectionAlignment);
>> >    if ((SectionAlignment & (EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT
>> - 1)) != 0) {
>> > -    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "!!!!!!!!  InsertImageRecord - Section
>> Alignment(0x%x) is not %dK  !!!!!!!!\n",
>> > +    DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "!!!!!!!!  UEFI2.5 PropertiesTable - Runtime
>> Driver Section Alignment(0x%x) is not %dK  !!!!!!!!\n",
>> >        SectionAlignment, EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT >>
>> 10));
>> >      PdbPointer = PeCoffLoaderGetPdbPointer ((VOID*) (UINTN)
>> ImageAddress);
>> >      if (PdbPointer != NULL) {
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>] On Behalf Of Gao, Liming
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:39 AM
>> > To: Michael Zimmermann; [email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> > Subject: Re: [edk2] Section Alignment of elf binaries compiled with
>> GCC(Linux)
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >   This is a warning message that describes the runtime driver alignment
>> is not 4K.
>> >
>> >   UEFI PropertiesTable table feature expects all runtime driver
>> alignment is 4K. When DxeCore loads Runtime driver, it will check its
>> alignment and report such warning message if it doesn't meet with the
>> alignment. If you want to enable this feature, you need to make sure all
>> runtime driver at 4K. If you don't enable it, you can just ignore this
>> message.
>> >
>> >   To configure runtime driver with 4K alignment, you can modify DSC
>> file to add the following section.
>> > [BuildOptions.common.EDKII.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
>> >   GCC:  *_*_*_DLINK_FLAGS = -z common-page-size=0x1000
>> >   MSFT: *_*_*_DLINK_FLAGS = /ALIGN:4096
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Liming
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>] On Behalf Of Michael Zimmermann
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 12:32 PM
>> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> > Subject: [edk2] Section Alignment of elf binaries compiled with
>> GCC(Linux)
>> >
>> > When booting(a new device I'm currently working on) I get these
>> warnings:
>> > !!!!!!!!  InsertImageRecord - Section Alignment(0x20) is not 4K
>> !!!!!!!!
>> >
>> > the warning is raised by "MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/PropertiesTable.c"
>> and when compiling using GCC from Linux, the SectionAlignment is set by
>> "BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf32Convert.c".
>> >
>> > I checked the resulting binaries using "readpe" and indeed they have a
>> SectionAlignment of 0x20, while the precompiled binaries like Shell.efi
>> have a Alignment of 0x1000(4K).
>> >
>> > So, is this a bug of my GCC compiler or of EDK2?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > edk2-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > edk2-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > edk2-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to