On 27 November 2015 at 14:47, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:26:51PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 27 November 2015 at 12:56, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:51:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Since UEFI on 32-bit ARM does not allow floating point arithmetic in >> >> hardware, >> >> running OpenSslLib unmodified requires a softfloat library. >> >> >> >> This series factors out the minimally required bits of >> >> StdLib/LibC/Softfloat, >> >> and copies them into a new library ArmPkg/Library/ArmSoftFloatLib. This >> >> library >> >> dependency is wired into OpenSslLib, and its resolution added to >> >> ArmVirt.dsc.inc >> >> >> >> Ard Biesheuvel (3): >> >> ArmPkg: factor out softfloat support from StdLib/LibC/SoftFloat >> >> CryptoPkg: add softfloat dependency for ARM >> >> ArmVirtPkg: add secure boot support to 32-bit ARM targets >> > >> > For 1(+2 if needed)/3: >> > Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> >> > >> >> Thanks Leif. >> >> I was considering adding the following to the .INF: >> >> """ >> [Binaries] >> # The softfloat library can only be built with GCC, so provide >> # a prebuilt binary for RVCT users. >> LIB|ArmSoftFloatLib.lib|*|RVCT >> """ >> >> and including the binary .lib, so that RVCT users (i.e., Eugene) are >> not left out in the cold. > > Why is this needed? (A quick skim reveals no reason why RVCT should > fail to build this.) > > Could this be solved by: > 1) Making the softfloat build with RVCT. > 2) Pulling in some parts of the RVCT C library? >
I got failures on missing system libraries, but actually, ripping out all #include <.../...> lines works fine. I'll add that to a separate patch, though. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
