Hi, > So, my question is: is this intended and supported behavior (that is, > going from a Secure Boot-capable build to a Secure Boot-disabled build, > while preserving the contents & functionality of the variables), or just > a lucky coincidence that results from the design choices you made while > unifying the variable drivers?
Related followup question: If the driver can dynamically switch formats now, is there any reason to ever create new varstores in the old format? thanks, Gerd _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
