> On Oct 5, 2016, at 2:45 PM, valerij zaporogeci <vlrzpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you very much, Andrew. > The last question. Regarding that scheme you depicted, which entity > will have ImageBase address when TE image is loaded in the memory? A > 'conceptual' stripped Pe headers, or Te header? > Which is placed (even conceptually) at ImageBase address? > P <--- This? (would have been here if presented) > P > P > PT <--- Or this? (really is put at ImageBase) > ---- > SECTION_TABLE > --- > .text SECTION > .data SECTION > .reloc SECTION > .debug SECTION >
The ImageBase is the same for PE/COFF and TE. In the code ImageAddress points to the start of T or P (well P can have a DOS header prepended etc). I think a lot of the code operates on ImageAddress and thus needs the adjustment. Thanks, Andrew Fish > Because looking at the AddressOfEntryPoint adjustment shows TE header > is placed at ImageBase address. But then again all sections (and the > addresses of referenced symbols) get shifted at the delta value > (StrippedSize - SizeOf(TE_HEADER)). The same as AddressOfEntryPoint. > If ImageBase points to non-existent Pe headers, before TE header, then > everything is fine with adresses in sections, but AddressOfEntryPoint > doesn't need to be adjusted as well contrary to what specification > says. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
