On 10/12/2016 03:17 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 7 October 2016 at 16:59, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> wrote:
Roy can now be found at Roy Franz <roy.fr...@hpe.com> (cc:d).
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:56:26PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 10/07/16 16:53, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
This patch series implements some improvements to the TtyTerm terminal
type in the TerminalDxe driver. It fixes an end case with cursor
position tracking, and uses that to optimize cursor motion escape
sequences. It also adds support for the page up, page down, insert,
home, and end keys on some additional common terminal emulators.
The result is improved performance, especially at the shell prompt,
and better compatibility with common terminal emulators. In
particular, as a side effect of the optimized cursor motion, terminal
windows which are taller than the current mode setting (eg. 25 lines)
work much better than before.
Most of these fixes have been in production in some form on SGI's
servers for years.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Brian Johnson <bjohn...@sgi.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.t...@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com>
Brian J. Johnson (3):
MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe: Improve TtyTerm cursor position tracking
MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe: Optimize TtyTerm cursor motion
MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe: Handle more keys with TtyTerm
.../Universal/Console/TerminalDxe/Terminal.h | 2 +
.../Universal/Console/TerminalDxe/TerminalConIn.c | 24 +++++++--
.../Universal/Console/TerminalDxe/TerminalConOut.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
can you please provide feedback (testing or otherwise) on this series?
Well, they "work" for me and I'd be happy with them being submitted.
Tested-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.har...@linaro.org>
The only curious effect I can see is the Print(L"xxx"); lines that
expect the \n to be missing will no longer "work". For example, I
carry a patch by Daniil Egranov titled
"IntelFrameworkModulePkg/BdsDxe: Show boot timeout message" and it no
longer displays the countdown on the same line each time, it prints
each message on a new line.
However, I don't see that as a blocking point, Daniil's patch could be
changed easily and there are other advantages to this series that make
it worthwhile, IMO, eg, Shell commands with lots of output (like
"help" or "dir fs0:") no longer create an awful mess on the serial
So, is this just waiting for a maintainer's review?
Brian J. Johnson
My statements are my own, are not authorized by SGI, and do not
necessarily represent SGI’s positions.
edk2-devel mailing list