I don't remember seeing any discussion regarding DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES on the list, so I am a bit surprised seeing these bugs being filed and assigned.
Before making any such changes, I would like a strong commitment from other package owners that deprecating an interface brings along with it the responsibility to update all existing callers, otherwise setting this define will only result in more breakage, and ARM has seen its share of inadvertent breakage in the past when changes to core code were made without taking other architectures into account. On 21 October 2016 at 02:21, <[email protected]> wrote: > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 > > [email protected] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Priority|Lowest |Normal > Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED > Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > Release(s) the| |EDK II Trunk > issues must be| | > fixed| | > > --- Comment #1 from [email protected] --- > Assign to Package owner. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
