On 11/15/16 03:18, Jeff Fan wrote:
> The GCC 5.4 will optimize mNumberToFinish in EarlyInitializeCpu(). It will 
> cause
> S3 resume failure.
> 
> Adding *volatile* could make sure compiler does not so such optimization.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.t...@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff....@intel.com>
> ---
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c 
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> index 3fb6864..f13ff3e 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ AsmGetAddressMap (
>  #define LEGACY_REGION_BASE    (0xA0000 - LEGACY_REGION_SIZE)
>  
>  ACPI_CPU_DATA                mAcpiCpuData;
> -UINT32                       mNumberToFinish;
> +volatile UINT32              mNumberToFinish;
>  MP_CPU_EXCHANGE_INFO         *mExchangeInfo;
>  BOOLEAN                      mRestoreSmmConfigurationInS3 = FALSE;
>  VOID                         *mGdtForAp = NULL;
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ EarlyMPRendezvousProcedure (
>    //
>    // Count down the number with lock mechanism.
>    //
> -  InterlockedDecrement (&mNumberToFinish);
> +  InterlockedDecrement ((UINT32 *) &mNumberToFinish);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ MPRendezvousProcedure (
>    TopOfStack  = (UINT32) (UINTN) Stack + sizeof (Stack);
>    TopOfStack &= ~(UINT32) (CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1);
>    CopyMem ((VOID *) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, mApHltLoopCodeTemplate, sizeof 
> (mApHltLoopCodeTemplate));
> -  TransferApToSafeState ((UINT32) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, 
> &mNumberToFinish);
> +  TransferApToSafeState ((UINT32) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, 
> (UINT32 *) &mNumberToFinish);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> 

I think I understand the idea, but the current solution requires you to
cast away "volatile" in two places. That's not nice, normally it is
undefined behavior.

I recommend to extend this patch, with more patches: please change the
prototype of TransferApToSafeState() so that it takes a pointer-to-volatile.

I also suggest to change the prototype of InterlockedDecrement(). (You
won't have to update all other call sites: it is fine to take/access a
non-volatile object as a volatile, but not the other way around.)

I agree this increases the scope of the patch quite a bit, so maybe
others should chime in as well.

Thanks!
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to