Thank you Laszlo.

This time, I did not use number purposely.

My thinking is that each patch resolves a specific problem. Although I fixed 
all of them at same time, they can be check in independently.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 5:51 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Fan, Jeff 
<jeff....@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PiSmmCore: AllocatePool should use 
MemoryType.

On 12/01/16 09:23, Jiewen Yao wrote:
> PiSmmCore supports page level protection based upon the Memory Type
> (EfiRuntimeServicesCode/EfiRuntimeServicesData) and PE image.
>
> However, the Memory Type information is ignored in AllocatePool().
> If a caller calls AllocatePool with EfiRuntimeServicesCode,
> the final memory is still allocated as EfiRuntimeServicesData.
>
> This patch supports AllocatePool with EfiRuntimeServicesCode.
>
> Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff....@intel.com<mailto:jeff....@intel.com>>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney 
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com<mailto:jiewen....@intel.com>>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmCore.h          |  13 ++-
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/Pool.c               |  66 +++++++++---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/SmramProfileRecord.c | 114 +++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

series
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>

(Please make sure to number the patches in the series next time.)

Thanks
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to