Michael:
  I understand your usage that BuildResourceDescriptorHob adds system memory 
range, BuildMemoryAllocationHob allocate the full memory range as reserved 
memory. Then, you expect they can be shown in EFI memory map. Right? 

  BuildResourceDescriptorHob() with (start,size) 0x80000000,0x80000000, then 
BuildMemoryAllocationHob() with (start,size) 0x80000000,0x80000000. It doesn't 
work. 
  Two BuildResourceDescriptorHob() with (start,size) 0x80000000,0x40000000 and 
0xc0000000,0x40000000, then two BuildMemoryAllocationHob(). It does work. Right?

Thanks
Liming
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Michael Zimmermann
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:57 AM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] correct way to reserve memory from PrePi?
> 
> I've enabled GCD debugging and apparently it doesn't accept the allocation:
> GCD:AllocateMemorySpace(Base=0000000090000000,Length=0000000010000
> 000)
>   GcdAllocateType = AtAddress
>   GcdMemoryType   = SystemMem
>   Alignment       = 0000000000000001
>   ImageHandle     = FDE28F90
>   DeviceHandle    = 0
> CoreAllocateSpaceCheckEntry:982 handle=FDE28F90
> CoreAllocateSpace:1130
>   Status = Not Found
> GCDMemType Range                             Capabilities
> Attributes
> ========== =================================
> ================
> ================
> NonExist   0000000000000000-000000007FFFFFFF 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000
> SystemMem  0000000080000000-00000000FDFFFFFF 800000000000000E
> 0000000000000000*
> NonExist   00000000FE000000-00000000FE3FFFFF 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000
> SystemMem  00000000FE400000-00000000FFFE5FFF 800000000000000E
> 0000000000000000
> SystemMem  00000000FFFE6000-00000000FFFEEFFF 800000000000000E
> 0000000000000000*
> SystemMem  00000000FFFEF000-00000000FFFFFFFF 800000000000000E
> 0000000000000000
> 
> 
> It fails in this line:
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe
> /Gcd/Gcd.c#L982
> In this example I've used(start,size) 0x80000000,0x80000000 for the
> resource descriptors.
> If I use 0x80000000,0x40000000 and 0xc0000000,0x40000000 everything
> works just fine.
> 
> Thanks
> Michael
> 
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Michael Zimmermann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As far as I know the proper way is to create resource descriptors
> > using BuildResourceDescriptorHob and then allocate reserved areas
> > using BuildMemoryAllocationHob. This way I don't have any overlapping
> > descriptors - I just allocated some memory very early.
> >
> > I ran many tests and it looks like all calls to
> > BuildMemoryAllocationHob get ignored if my dram hobs look like this:
> > 0x00000000 - 0x40000000
> >
> > If I split this range into two Hob's like this everything seems to
> > work just fine:
> > 0x00000000 - 0x20000000
> > 0x20000000 - 0x20000000
> >
> > I took a look at other platforms like Juno and they add big dram Hob's
> > (2GB and 6GB) too so why is this a problem?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Michael
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 14 December 2016 at 10:02, Michael Zimmermann
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I tried both BuildResourceDescriptorHob and BuildMemoryAllocationHob
> >>> but apparently they don't have any effect.
> >>> When I look at the output of the shell's memmap command there aren't
> >>> any reserved/unavailable pages.
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore, when using AllocatePages with one of the physical
> >>> addresses which I've reserved it succeeds which means that it's not
> >>> just a problem of how the memmap command works.
> >>>
> >>> Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think you need to ensure that they don't overlap existing resource
> >> descriptors: if you declare a region as reserved, you should not
> >> declare it as memory first
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to