On 24 March 2017 at 03:44, Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com> wrote:
> I just think it seems a generic problem.
> Some platforms may dynamically determine whether ACPI should be supported or
> not.
> Some platforms may dynamically determine whether SMBIOS should be supported
> or not.
> Some platforms may dynamically determine whether HII should be supported or
> not.
> ...
>
> We are thinking whether we can have a generic NULL instance to support all
> this kind of cases, for example:
> 1. Define a FixedAtBuild PCD PcdDepexGuid that will be a VOID* type PCD point
> to a depex GUID.
> 2. Implement a NULL instance DepexLib.
> [Defines]
> INF_VERSION = 0x00010005
> BASE_NAME = DepexLib
> FILE_GUID = XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX
> MODULE_TYPE = BASE
> VERSION_STRING = 1.0
> LIBRARY_CLASS = NULL
>
> [Sources]
> DepexLib.c
>
> [Packages]
> XXXPkg/XXXPkg.dec
>
> [Depex]
> PcdDepexGuid
>
> 3. Link NULL instance and configure PCD in dsc.
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableDxe.inf {
> <LibraryClasses>
> NULL|XXXPkg/Library/DepexLib/DepexLib.inf
> <PcdsFixedAtBuild>
> PcdDepexGuid|gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid
> }
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/SmbiosDxe/SmbiosDxe.inf {
> <LibraryClasses>
> NULL|XXXPkg/Library/DepexLib/DepexLib.inf
> <PcdsFixedAtBuild>
> PcdDepexGuid|gEdkiiPlatformHasSmbiosGuid
> }
>
> But current BaseTools does not support the syntax to declare PCD in [Depex]
> section of inf yet.
>
> Based on the statements above, I have below comments.
> 1. I agree to add the GUID into MdeModulePkg, but how about using
> gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid instead of gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiProtocolGuid and
> add the GUID into [Guids] section of MdeModulePkg.dec? As Platform can
> install gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid PPI to control PEIM and install
> gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid PROTOCOL to control DRIVER. And another, no need to
> add a include file PlatformHasAcpi.h as BaseTools supports to add the GUID
> definitions to AutoGen files from package dec.
> 2. You can file bugzilla bug to request BaseTools syntax support to declare
> PCD in [Depex] section of inf. Then PcdDepexGuid and DepexLib could be
> finally added into core package MdeModulePkg or even MdePkg (I prefer).
> Before that, how about implementing the PlatformHasAcpiLib in none core
> package?
>
Hello Star,
Thanks for taking the time to think about this. It is much appreciated.
I like the generic approach for dynamic dependencies. The more
architectures are supported in UEFI, the more often we are likely to
see the need for such things.
I will let Laszlo speak for himself, as the author of the patches, but
I am perfectly fine with
a) the outline above of how we address this in the long term,
b) taking anything we need for the short term into ArmPkg, and move it
to MdeModulePkg and/or MdePkg later.
Thanks,
Ard.
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
