On 2017-05-01 16:07:48, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 05/01/17 21:20, Jordan Justen wrote: > > > > At this I'd just like figure out what to do about the 4MB layout, so > > can we stop getting worked up over this side show? > > Thanks for calling it a side show, real friendly.
Ok, I apologize. The 'side show' comment applies equally to me. Can we please just move on? We obviously disagree how to determine how full 2MB is, but it doesn't much matter since you'll soon be abandoning it entirely. We have too much room in the 4MB fridge to be concerned about this. > The only email (that I can see) in this thread that I haven't reacted to is: > > http://mid.mail-archive.com/149365894632.25909.11739243410891079091@jljusten-skl > > where you wrote "I'd rather go with 128k, and I'd also rather stay with > 2MB". You dropped my ":)" :) Ok, me adding that was a poor choice, despite including a smiley. I meant to convey was: "Ok, fine, let's figure out the 4MB layout, but I still want to whine about it a little more." -Jordan _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
