Andrew:
  I have no more detail than the comment. This logic is here since the first 
version edk2 project. Per the comment, it should handle the one special PE 
image that was generated in the old compiler. For TE image, its image size is 
calculated by the RVA plus the VirtualSize of the last section mapped into 
memory. So, its image size should include the debug info. This is just my 
analysis. If there is such PE image, I can further verify this logic.

Thanks
Liming
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 12:51 AM
To: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build 
AppPkg with XCODE5

Liming,

Your right I'm off by one. The signature is in the thing 
EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY points to.

I do have a question. Why does the PE/COFF code have an extra step. The TE 
images are converted PE/COFF images so would not you need this code in both 
places? Is there some other assumption in play here?

https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c#L769




          //


          // From PeCoff spec, when DebugEntry.RVA == 0 means this debug info 
will not load into memory.


          // Here we will always load EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW type debug 
info. so need adjust the


          // ImageContext->ImageSize when DebugEntry.RVA == 0.


          //


          if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {


            ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) 
(DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);


            if (DebugEntry.RVA == 0 && DebugEntry.FileOffset != 0) {


              ImageContext->ImageSize += DebugEntry.SizeOfData;


            }





            return RETURN_SUCCESS;


          }




https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c#L862




        if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {


          ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) 
(DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);


          return RETURN_SUCCESS;


        }



Thanks,

Andrew Fish

On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Gao, Liming 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Andrew:
 I get your point. I agree edk2 firmware to support old EFI image. And, I 
review the change in BasePeCoffLib. But, I think it is unnecessary. Below is 
the current logic. On the first loop, DebugEntry.Type is 
EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW, then will return. It doesn't enter into second 
loop. For mtoc debug entry, its DebugEntry.Type is also 
EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW, its DEBUG_CODEVIEW_ ENTRY Signature is 
CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC. So, it will be handled in this logic.

       for (Index = 0; Index < DebugDirectoryEntry->Size; Index += sizeof 
(EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY)) {
         //
         // Read next debug directory entry
         //
         Size = sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);
         ...

         //
         // From PeCoff spec, when DebugEntry.RVA == 0 means this debug info 
will not load into memory.
         // Here we will always load EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW type debug 
info. so need adjust the
         // ImageContext->ImageSize when DebugEntry.RVA == 0.
         //
         if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
           ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) 
(DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);
           if (DebugEntry.RVA == 0 && DebugEntry.FileOffset != 0) {
             ImageContext->ImageSize += DebugEntry.SizeOfData;
           }

           return RETURN_SUCCESS;
         }
       }

Thanks
Liming

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:08 PM
To: Gao, Liming <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; edk2-
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
AppPkg with XCODE5



On Aug 10, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Gao, Liming 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Andrew:
Edk2 Build system calls GenFw to generate EFI image in build phase. Even if
this image is not built into BIOS image, its EFI image will be generated by
GenFw. So, only if this EFI image is built from EDK2 project, it can be updated
by GenFw tool. You can see this step in build_rule.txt to convert .dll to .efi
image.



Gao,

We can fix the future for edk2, but we can't change the past, or change other
build systems. It is not safe to assume that every EFI executable that the DXE
Core will see is as new as the firmware, or was even built via the edk2. Option
ROMs and OS loaders are good examples of this issue.

Thanks,

Andrew Fish


Thanks
Liming
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:59 AM
To: Gao, Liming <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Zhu, Yonghong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
Kinney, Michael D
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
AppPkg with XCODE5



On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:38 AM, Gao, Liming
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:


Andrew:
If this is a mtoc bug, I suggest to update GenFw to always correct it in the
generated EFI image. If so, the EFI image is always correct. There is no change
requirement in PeCoff library in MdePkg.



Liming,

EFI supports loading PE/COFF images that are not built at the same time as
the platform firmware (UEFI Shell, OS loader), and that is why I added the fix
to the PE/COFF library code.


Thanks,

Andrew Fish


Thanks
Liming
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>
 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 12:26 AM
To: Zhu, Yonghong
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>>

Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>;
 Gao, Liming
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>>;
 Kinney, Michael D
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>>

Subject: Re: [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
AppPkg with XCODE5


Should that be:
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1

I also noticed the PeCoff lib is going to loop and reload the .debug suction
due to this mtoc bug, so it would be good to harden that code too.


git diff MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
b/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c

index 8d1daba..1e4c67e 100644
--- a/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
+++ b/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
@@ -771,6 +771,8 @@ PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo (
          }

          return RETURN_SUCCESS;
+          } else if (DebugEntry.Type == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
+            return RETURN_SUCCESS;
        }
      }
    }
@@ -862,6 +864,8 @@ PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo (
      if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
        ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32)
(DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);

        return RETURN_SUCCESS;
+        } else if (DebugEntry.Type == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
+          return RETURN_SUCCESS;
      }
    }
  }



https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1

Thanks,

Andrew Fish


On Aug 6, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Yonghong Zhu
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>><mailto:yongho
[email protected]<mailto:yongho%[email protected]>>> wrote:


it is a bug in mtoc setting the size of the debug directory entry to
the size of the .debug section, not the size of the
EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY. It was causing a loop to iterate and
get bogus EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY data and pass that to
memset() and boom.

Cc: Liming Gao
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>><mailto:liming.gao@int
el.com<mailto:liming.gao@int%0bel.com>>>

Cc: Michael D Kinney
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>><mailto:m
[email protected]<mailto:m%[email protected]>>>

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fish
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]>>

---
BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c

index 246deb0..af60c92 100644
--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
+++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
@@ -2813,10 +2813,11 @@ Returns:
//
// Get Debug, Export and Resource EntryTable RVA address.
// Resource Directory entry need to review.
//
Optional32Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr +
sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));

+  Optional64Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER64 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr
+ sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));

if (Optional32Hdr->Magic == EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) {
 SectionHeader = (EFI_IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER *) ((UINT8 *)
Optional32Hdr +  FileHdr->SizeOfOptionalHeader);

 if (Optional32Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes >
EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT && \

     Optional32Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].Size != 0) {
   ExportDirectoryEntryRva = Optional32Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress;
@@ -2833,11 +2834,10 @@ Returns:
     Optional32Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = 0;
     Optional32Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress = 0;
   }
 }
} else {
-    Optional64Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER64 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr
+ sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));

 SectionHeader = (EFI_IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER *) ((UINT8 *)
Optional64Hdr +  FileHdr->SizeOfOptionalHeader);

 if (Optional64Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes >
EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT && \

     Optional64Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].Size != 0) {
   ExportDirectoryEntryRva = Optional64Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress;
 }
@@ -2907,10 +2907,20 @@ Returns:
       RsdsEntry->Unknown  = 0;
       RsdsEntry->Unknown2 = 0;
       RsdsEntry->Unknown3 = 0;
       RsdsEntry->Unknown4 = 0;
       RsdsEntry->Unknown5 = 0;
+        } else if (RsdsEntry->Signature == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
+          // MTOC sets DebugDirectoryEntrySize to size of the .debug section,
so fix it.

+          if (!ZeroDebugFlag) {
+            if (Optional32Hdr->Magic ==
EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) {

+              Optional32Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = sizeof
(EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);

+            } else {
+              Optional64Hdr-
DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = sizeof
(EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);

+            }
+          }
+          break;
     }
   }
 }
}

--
2.6.1.windows.1

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to