Hey,

I just noticed this patch as it recently has been pushed. I found this has been 
a reaction to https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410
Though as Clang correctly detected, this is Undefined Behavior per the C 
specification, so why was the warning hidden?
In context of the issue in UefiLib, providing the first element of the VA list 
as a prototyped argument, would have solved the issue without UB.

Do you wish such a patch?

Thanks,
Marvin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Gao, Liming
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 9:19 AM
> To: Shi, Steven <steven....@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools/Conf: Support LLVM39 and LLVM40 in
> CLANG38 toolchain
> 
> Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com>
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Shi, Steven
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 3:01 PM
> >To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>
> >Cc: Zhu, Yonghong <yonghong....@intel.com>; Shi, Steven
> ><steven....@intel.com>
> >Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools/Conf: Support LLVM39 and LLVM40 in CLANG38
> >toolchain
> >
> >From: "Shi, Steven" <steven....@intel.com>
> >
> >Add LLVM39 and LLVM40 support in CLANG38 toolchain
> >
> >Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> >Signed-off-by: Steven Shi <steven....@intel.com>
> >---
> > BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
> >b/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
> >index 1fa3ca3..2f83341 100755
> >--- a/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
> >+++ b/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
> >@@ -380,7 +380,8 @@ DEFINE SOURCERY_CYGWIN_TOOLS =
> /cygdrive/c/Program
> >Files/CodeSourcery/Sourcery G
> > #                               Intel(r) ACPI Compiler from
> > #                               https://acpica.org/downloads
> > #   CLANG38  -Linux-  Requires:
> >-#                             Clang v3.8 or later, LLVMgold plugin and GNU 
> >binutils 2.26
> >targeting x86_64-linux-gnu
> >+#                             Clang v3.8, LLVMgold plugin and GNU binutils 
> >2.26
> targeting
> >x86_64-linux-gnu
> >+#                             Clang v3.9 or later, LLVMgold plugin and GNU 
> >binutils 2.28
> >targeting x86_64-linux-gnu
> > #                        Optional:
> > #                             Required to build platforms or ACPI tables:
> > #                               Intel(r) ACPI Compiler from
> >@@ -5512,7 +5513,7 @@ DEFINE CLANG38_X64_PREFIX           =
> >ENV(CLANG38_BIN)
> > DEFINE CLANG38_IA32_TARGET          = -target i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > DEFINE CLANG38_X64_TARGET           = -target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> >
> >-DEFINE CLANG38_ALL_CC_FLAGS         = DEF(GCC44_ALL_CC_FLAGS) -Wno-
> >empty-body -fno-stack-protector -mms-bitfields -Wno-address -Wno-shift-
> >negative-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unknown-pragmas -
> Wno-
> >tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare -Wno-incompatible-library-
> >redeclaration -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -
> msoft-
> >float -mno-implicit-float  -ftrap-
> >function=undefined_behavior_has_been_optimized_away_by_clang -
> >funsigned-char -fno-ms-extensions -Wno-null-dereference -Wno-
> >tautological-compare -Wno-unknown-warning-option
> >+DEFINE CLANG38_ALL_CC_FLAGS         = DEF(GCC44_ALL_CC_FLAGS) -
> Wno-
> >empty-body -fno-stack-protector -mms-bitfields -Wno-address -Wno-shift-
> >negative-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unknown-pragmas -
> Wno-
> >tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare -Wno-incompatible-library-
> >redeclaration -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -
> msoft-
> >float -mno-implicit-float  -ftrap-
> >function=undefined_behavior_has_been_optimized_away_by_clang -
> >funsigned-char -fno-ms-extensions -Wno-null-dereference -Wno-
> >tautological-compare -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wno-varargs
> >
> > ###########################
> > # CLANG38 IA32 definitions
> >--
> >2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to