Star: Crc32 change is not required . I just gives my comment on it. So, there is no consistent issue here. We can keep this patch.
Thanks Liming >-----Original Message----- >From: Zeng, Star >Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 2:25 PM >To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org >Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Gao, >Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com> >Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH v2 6/6] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix >possible out of range left shift > >I prefer to have the code consistent between this patch with [PATCH v2 5/6] >MdeModulePkg/Crc32: Fix possible out of range left shift. > >Both to use (UINT32) typecast or 1U. > >Liming, Do you have any comment? > > >Thanks, >Star >-----Original Message----- >From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Hao >Wu >Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 2:46 PM >To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org >Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; >Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com> >Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 6/6] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix >possible out of range left shift > >REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699 > >Within function AhciModeInitialization(), left shift operations of 'BIT0' >in the following statements: >"if ((PortImplementBitMap & (BIT0 << Port)) != 0) {" > >will incur possible out of range left shift when Port is 31, since >"1 << 31" is possible to exceed the range of type 'int' (signed). > >According to the C11 spec, Section 6.5.7: >> 4 The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated >> bits are filled with zeros. If E1 has an unsigned type, the value >> of the result is E1 * 2^E2 , reduced modulo one more than the >> maximum value representable in the result type. If E1 has a signed >> type and nonnegative value, and E1 * 2^E2 is representable in the >> result type, then that is the resulting value; otherwise, the >> behavior is undefined. > >This commit explicitly cast 'BIT0' with UINT32 to resolve this issue. > >Cc: Steven Shi <steven....@intel.com> >Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com> >Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com> >Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 >Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a...@intel.com> >--- > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c >b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c >index b954de8101..e6de5d65bc 100644 >--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c >+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c >@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > /** @file > The file for AHCI mode of ATA host controller. > >- Copyright (c) 2010 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR> >+ Copyright (c) 2010 - 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights >+ reserved.<BR> > (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR> > This program and the accompanying materials > are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD >License @@ -2314,7 +2314,7 @@ AhciModeInitialization ( > } > > for (Port = 0; Port < EFI_AHCI_MAX_PORTS; Port ++) { >- if ((PortImplementBitMap & (BIT0 << Port)) != 0) { >+ if ((PortImplementBitMap & (((UINT32)BIT0) << Port)) != 0) { > // > // According to AHCI spec, MaxPortNumber should be equal or greater >than the number of implemented ports. > // >-- >2.12.0.windows.1 > >_______________________________________________ >edk2-devel mailing list >edk2-devel@lists.01.org >https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
