On 11/16/17 18:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Switch to the new, cleaned up PL011UartLib implementation so we will > be able to remove the old one. > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > --- > ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc | 2 +- > ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/EarlyFdtPL011SerialPortLib.c | 5 > ++--- > ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.c | 5 > ++--- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc > index c92a69281ae4..50eb8675d1c0 100644 > --- a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc > +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ [LibraryClasses.common] > > RealTimeClockLib|ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL031RealTimeClockLib/PL031RealTimeClockLib.inf > TimeBaseLib|EmbeddedPkg/Library/TimeBaseLib/TimeBaseLib.inf > # ARM PL011 UART Driver > - PL011UartLib|ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/PL011Uart/PL011Uart.inf > + PL011UartLib|ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL011UartLib/PL011UartLib.inf > > SerialPortLib|ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.inf > > # > diff --git > a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/EarlyFdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/EarlyFdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > index e28750f3b4c4..d9fd0ef98359 100644 > --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/EarlyFdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/EarlyFdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > @@ -16,14 +16,13 @@ > > **/ > > -#include <Base.h> > +#include <Uefi.h> > > #include <Library/PcdLib.h> > +#include <Library/PL011UartLib.h> > #include <Library/SerialPortLib.h> > #include <libfdt.h> > > -#include <Drivers/PL011Uart.h> > - > RETURN_STATUS > EFIAPI > SerialPortInitialize ( > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > index 05d3547fda91..c161dd6349d3 100644 > --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.c > @@ -17,9 +17,10 @@ > > **/ > > -#include <Base.h> > +#include <Uefi.h> > > #include <Library/PcdLib.h> > +#include <Library/PL011UartLib.h> > #include <Library/SerialPortLib.h> > #include <Pi/PiBootMode.h> > #include <Uefi/UefiBaseType.h> > @@ -28,8 +29,6 @@ > #include <Library/HobLib.h> > #include <Guid/EarlyPL011BaseAddress.h> > > -#include <Drivers/PL011Uart.h> > - > STATIC UINTN mSerialBaseAddress; > > RETURN_STATUS >
Awesome idea! One comment: can you please check whether, if you replace #include <Uefi.h> with #include <Uefi/UefiBaseType.h> then stuff will still build? Both SerialPortLib instances are BASE, so we should not include <Uefi.h> (in particular <Uefi/UefiSpec.h> included by it). If it works, then: Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> If it doesn't work, then I think we should figure out why not; it could be a sign of some layering violation, which would be nice to document at least in the commit message. Thanks Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel