Hi Xiang,

On 12/14/2017 02:25 PM, zhengxiang (A) wrote:


On 2017/12/14 17:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/12/2017 07:55, zhengxiang (A) wrote:
Hello Laszlo and Paolo,

Thanks for your review!

On 2017/12/13 19:16, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 12/13/17 10:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/12/2017 09:35, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Perhaps you can update vhost-scsi similarly to the last patch of
Maxime's v4 series, even without "VIRTIO_SCSI_F_MQ" -- in the
SET_FEATURES request handler, just destroy the unused virtqueues that
have not been configured by the guest driver until that time?
Yes, this is the right solution.  We can assume that if the descriptor
address is equal to zero, the queue is not in use.  This is not in the
spec as far as I can see, but it is QEMU's assumption.  I will send a
patch to the virtio specification.

I would try this solution! However, is there any possibility that the allocated
descriptor address is exactly equal to zero and the queue is in use?

That would break QEMU's virtio implementation, so it's pretty unlikely.

Paolo


So could I judge the not-in-use queues by adding the below sentence in order
to skip calling vhost_virtqueue_start?

diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
index e4290ce..05c3322 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
@@ -1532,6 +1532,7 @@ int vhost_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice 
*vdev)
          goto fail_mem;
      }
      for (i = 0; i < hdev->nvqs; ++i) {
+        if (virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, i) == 0) continue;
          r = vhost_virtqueue_start(hdev,
                                    vdev,
                                    hdev->vqs + i,


I think it should work, or you could detect it by checking that desc,
used and avail rings have the same address.

We would need this also for virtio-net, as Windows guest only setup as
much queue pairs as vcpus, but vhost_virtqueue_start is called for all
queue pairs declred in QEMU. With DPDK Vhost-user backend, it turns out
that it uses these uninitialized queues, corrupting guest's physical
address 0.

Do you plan to post the fix, or you'd like me to propose it?

Thanks,
Maxime
Thanks,
Xiang

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to