Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Star
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang, Jian J 
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 3:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Zeng, 
Star <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/Core: fix a logic hole in page free

This hole will cause page fault randomly. The root cause is that Guard page, 
which is just freed back to page pool but not yet cleared not- present 
attribute, will be allocated right away by internal function 
CoreFreeMemoryMapStack(). The solution to this issue is to clear the 
not-present attribute for freed Guard page before doing any free operation, 
instead of after those operation.

The reason we didn't do this before is due to the fact that manipulating page 
attributes might cause memory allocation action which would cause a dead lock 
inside a memory allocation/free operation. So we always set or unset Guard page 
outside the memory lock. After a thorough analysis, we believe clearing a Guard 
page will not cause memory allocation because memory we're to manipulate was 
already manipulated before for sure.
Therefore there should be no memory allocation occurring in this situation.

Since we cleared Guard page not-present attribute before freeing instead of 
after freeing, the debug code to clear freed memory can now be restored to its 
original way (aka no checking and bypassing Guard page).

Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <[email protected]>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c | 15 +++++++++++++
 MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c      | 40 ++++++-----------------------------
 MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c      | 10 +++++++--
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c 
b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c
index 0f035043e1..92753c7269 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c
@@ -1127,11 +1127,26 @@ CoreConvertPagesWithGuard (
   IN EFI_MEMORY_TYPE  NewType
   )
 {
+  UINT64  OldStart;
+  UINTN   OldPages;
+
   if (NewType == EfiConventionalMemory) {
+    OldStart = Start;
+    OldPages = NumberOfPages;
+
     AdjustMemoryF (&Start, &NumberOfPages);
     if (NumberOfPages == 0) {
       return EFI_SUCCESS;
     }
+
+    //
+    // It's safe to unset Guard page inside memory lock because there should
+    // be no memory allocation occurred in updating memory page attribute at
+    // this point. And unsetting Guard page before free will prevent Guard
+    // page just freed back to pool from being allocated right away before
+    // marking it usable (from non-present to present).
+    //
+    UnsetGuardForMemory (OldStart, OldPages);
   } else {
     AdjustMemoryA (&Start, &NumberOfPages);
   }
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
index db32d0f940..8d5d03a6d9 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
@@ -900,42 +900,17 @@ CoreConvertPagesEx (
     //
     CoreAddRange (MemType, Start, RangeEnd, Attribute);
     if (ChangingType && (MemType == EfiConventionalMemory)) {
+      //
+      // Avoid calling DEBUG_CLEAR_MEMORY() for an address of 0 because this
+      // macro will ASSERT() if address is 0.  Instead, CoreAddRange() 
guarantees
+      // that the page starting at address 0 is always filled with zeros.
+      //
       if (Start == 0) {
-        //
-        // Avoid calling DEBUG_CLEAR_MEMORY() for an address of 0 because this
-        // macro will ASSERT() if address is 0.  Instead, CoreAddRange()
-        // guarantees that the page starting at address 0 is always filled
-        // with zeros.
-        //
         if (RangeEnd > EFI_PAGE_SIZE) {
           DEBUG_CLEAR_MEMORY ((VOID *)(UINTN) EFI_PAGE_SIZE, (UINTN) (RangeEnd 
- EFI_PAGE_SIZE + 1));
         }
       } else {
-        //
-        // If Heap Guard is enabled, the page at the top and/or bottom of
-        // this memory block to free might be inaccessible. Skipping them
-        // to avoid page fault exception.
-        //
-        UINT64  StartToClear;
-        UINT64  EndToClear;
-
-        StartToClear = Start;
-        EndToClear   = RangeEnd + 1;
-        if (PcdGet8 (PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask) & (BIT1|BIT0)) {
-          if (IsGuardPage(StartToClear)) {
-            StartToClear += EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
-          }
-          if (IsGuardPage (EndToClear - 1)) {
-            EndToClear -= EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
-          }
-        }
-
-        if (EndToClear > StartToClear) {
-          DEBUG_CLEAR_MEMORY(
-            (VOID *)(UINTN)StartToClear,
-            (UINTN)(EndToClear - StartToClear)
-            );
-        }
+        DEBUG_CLEAR_MEMORY ((VOID *)(UINTN) Start, (UINTN) (RangeEnd - 
+ Start + 1));
       }
     }
 
@@ -1513,9 +1488,6 @@ CoreInternalFreePages (
 
 Done:
   CoreReleaseMemoryLock ();
-  if (IsGuarded) {
-    UnsetGuardForMemory(Memory, NumberOfPages);
-  }
   return Status;
 }
 
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
index 7464d8773a..df9a1d28df 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
@@ -643,10 +643,16 @@ CoreFreePoolPagesWithGuard (
 
   AdjustMemoryF (&Memory, &NoPages);
   if (NoPages > 0) {
+    //
+    // It's safe to unset Guard page inside memory lock because there should
+    // be no memory allocation occurred in updating memory page attribute at
+    // this point. And unsetting Guard page before free will prevent Guard
+    // page just freed back to pool from being allocated right away before
+    // marking it usable (from non-present to present).
+    //
+    UnsetGuardForMemory (MemoryGuarded, NoPagesGuarded);
     CoreFreePoolPagesI (PoolType, Memory, NoPages);
   }
-
-  UnsetGuardForMemory (MemoryGuarded, NoPagesGuarded);  }
 
 /**
--
2.15.1.windows.2

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to