On 19/04/18 15:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 19 April 2018 at 16:23, Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
Hi Ard,

Sorry for the late reply.

On 19/04/18 09:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

On 17 April 2018 at 08:03, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
wrote:

When we first ported EDK2 to KVM/arm, we implemented a workaround for
the quirky timer handling on the KVM side. This has been fixed in
Linux commit f120cd6533d2 ("KVM: arm/arm64: timer: Allow the timer to
control the active state") dated 23 June 2014, which was incorporated
into Linux release 4.3.

So almost 4 years later, it should be safe to drop this workaround on
the EDK2 side.

This reverts commit b1a633434ddc.

Cc: cross-dis...@lists.linaro.org
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>


Pushed as 411a373ed6426fb1bff253905b6a59ada44e18ad


While this was added for KVM, I believe that code is also needed by Xen.
Indeed before injecting the interrupt the hypervisor will mask the
interrupt.

So would it be possible to revert that patch?


Given that this is now a Xen-only quirk, I'd rather work around it by
creating a separate ArmGenericTimerCounterLib implementation for Xen.

That would work for me.


I will try to put something together beginning of next week.

I am happy to test it.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to