在 8/9/2018 8:27 PM, Leif Lindholm 写道:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:15:27PM +0800, Ming wrote:
>> 在 8/4/2018 11:14 PM, Leif Lindholm 写道:
>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:09:17PM +0800, Ming Huang wrote:
>>>> From: ZhenYao <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> When BIOS booting, the power consumption is too high, so need close
>>>> some clusters clock that don't work to reduce power consumption.
>>>
>>> On the one hand: should this not be handled in ARM-TF?
>>
>> This can no be handled in TF and should be handled in Sec phase.
> 
> OK.
> Well, as long as it's in Sec phase, I guess it doesn't make too much
> difference.
> 
>>> What if (during development) we load a bad EDK2 image?
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand really.
> 
> What happens to the system if the EDK2 image crashes before we get
> here? Will it overheat and damage the silicon? Or is it purely a power
> consumption issue to avoid blowing the fuses in the data centre when
> you power on a whole rack at once?

It will not damage the silicon if wo load a bad EDK2 image.
It is purely a power consumption issue.

> 
> /
>     Leif
> 
>>>> The implementation of functions is in edk2-non-osi.
>>>>
>>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>>> Signed-off-by: ZhenYao <[email protected]>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Huang <[email protected]>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Silicon/Hisilicon/Include/Library/PlatformSysCtrlLib.h | 3 +++
>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Silicon/Hisilicon/Include/Library/PlatformSysCtrlLib.h 
>>>> b/Silicon/Hisilicon/Include/Library/PlatformSysCtrlLib.h
>>>> index ec2b9a36e7..cc60e213de 100644
>>>> --- a/Silicon/Hisilicon/Include/Library/PlatformSysCtrlLib.h
>>>> +++ b/Silicon/Hisilicon/Include/Library/PlatformSysCtrlLib.h
>>>> @@ -102,5 +102,8 @@ VOID PlatformEventBroadcastConfig(VOID);
>>>>  UINTN GetDjtagRegBase(UINT32 NodeId);
>>>>  VOID LlcCleanInvalidateAsm(VOID);
>>>>  VOID PlatformMdioInit(VOID);
>>>> +VOID CloseClusterClock(UINTN CpuClusterBase);
>>>
>>> The opposite of Enable is Disable. So Could this be DisableClusterClock?
>>
>> Yes, this name is better.
>>
>>>
>>>> +VOID EnableClusterClock(UINTN CpuClusterBase);
>>>> +VOID CloseSktClock (UINT8 Skt);
>>>
>>> Disable?
>>> Also, Socket, not Skt.
>>
>> OK, modify it in v2.
>>
>>>
>>> /
>>>     Leif
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  #endif
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.17.0
>>>>
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to