On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > The CLA is missing an ‘or’ in section 3. > > > > > > See https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an example > of the > > > specific text. > > > > could you please turn this report into a real patch (if the suggested > > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I could do it as well, > > just so we have something to review on the list, but: > > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid, > > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was originally invented. > > Would this require a revision bump to 1.2? > > Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the premises under which > certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to contribute. > Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump to 1.1. > > / > Leif Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens the conditions, so it’s not a harmful change for those who did notice that the meaning of the original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the majority assumed it had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to that instead. Hen > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
