On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:43:31PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> In preparation of creating a SMM version of the FIP006 NOR flash
> driver, refactor the existing pieces into a core driver, the FVB
> methods and the DXE instantiation code.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>

I only have one nitpicky question on this patch:

> ---
>  Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/Fip006Dxe.inf                  
>      |    6 +-
>  Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlash.c                     
>      | 1006 +++++++++++++++++
>  Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/{NorFlashDxe.h => NorFlash.h}  
>      |   52 +-
>  Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.c                  
>      | 1150 +++-----------------
>  Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/{NorFlashFvbDxe.c => 
> NorFlashFvb.c} |  161 +--
>  5 files changed, 1194 insertions(+), 1181 deletions(-)
> 

> diff --git a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.h 
> b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlash.h
> similarity index 88%
> rename from Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.h
> rename to Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlash.h
> index 20e74b0320ce..61b8e6a08fa0 100644
> --- a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.h
> +++ b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlash.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,9 @@
>  #include <Protocol/FirmwareVolumeBlock.h>
>  
>  #include <Library/DebugLib.h>
> -#include <Library/DxeServicesTableLib.h>
>  #include <Library/IoLib.h>
> +#include <Library/MemoryAllocationLib.h>

Why add this include?
I'm not going to ask to move out the existing headers not actually
used by this file, but could we avoid adding new ones?

https://edk2-docs.gitbooks.io/edk-ii-c-coding-standards-specification/content/v/release/2.20/5_source_files/53_include_files.html#534-include-files-may-include-only-those-headers-that-it-directly-depends-upon
is actually a rule I agree with.

But also, aren't all of the users of this file already manually
including this one?

>  #include <Library/NorFlashPlatformLib.h>
> -#include <Library/UefiLib.h>
> -#include <Library/UefiRuntimeLib.h>
>  
>  #include "Fip006Reg.h"
>

> diff --git a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.c 
> b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.c
> index e52ab52d8cf7..6c07799b22d8 100644
> --- a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.c
> +++ b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Drivers/Fip006Dxe/NorFlashDxe.c
> @@ -15,15 +15,16 @@
>  **/
>  
>  #include <Library/BaseMemoryLib.h>
> +#include <Library/DxeServicesTableLib.h>
> +#include <Library/HobLib.h>
>  #include <Library/MemoryAllocationLib.h>

At least this one does.

>  #include <Library/NorFlashInfoLib.h>
>  #include <Library/PcdLib.h>
>  #include <Library/UefiBootServicesTableLib.h>
>  #include <Library/UefiLib.h>
> +#include <Library/UefiRuntimeLib.h>
>  
> -#include "NorFlashDxe.h"
> -
> -STATIC EFI_EVENT mNorFlashVirtualAddrChangeEvent;
> +#include "NorFlash.h"
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to