Hi Bob,

On 02/14/19 03:51, Feng, Bob C wrote:
> Hi Laszlo, Liming, Jaben and Dandan,
> I found this is a Ubuntu18 bug. Refer to
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdroidserver/+bug/1762183

That Ubuntu bug is *related*, but it's not a bug that matters for us.

The bug above is about another package; it is called "fdroidserver". The
"fdroidserver" package has a hard runtime dependency on the python
"distutils.util" module.

Package management systems on Linux distributions track inter-package
dependencies. That is, if the meta-data on the "fdroidserver" package
explicitly lists the "python3-distutils" package as a dependency, then
the package management system will automatically install in
"python3-distutils" when the user requests "fdroidserver".

However, if the meta-data on the "fdroidserver" package are incorrect
(buggy), then the package management system will have no clue. And, if
the "python3-distutils" package is not already installed for some other
reason, then the user will get an installation or runtime error, when
they try to install or run "fdroidserver".

So, to be clear, the bug report you reference describes a *similar*
situation to ours (a missing dependency), but it's not the same case.
The bug you refer to is in the "fdroidserver" package, and they fixed it
in Ubuntu by updating / correcting the meta-data on the "fdroidserver"
package. The "python3-distutils" package, or other parts of the OS, were
not touched.

> And Ubuntu fixed this bug via a Ubuntu18.04.1 update package which was
> published on 2018-08-09. Refer to
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdroidserver/1.0.9-1~18.04.1

The link you provide confirms what I wrote above. It is a changelog for
the "fdroidserver" package, and the relevant entry says "fix missing
Python distutils dependency".

> While the latest Ubuntu 18.04 release
> (ubuntu-18.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso)  on
> http://releases.ubuntu.com/18.04/ was published on 2018-07-25.  So
> there is no distutils.util library on Ubuntu18.04 default
> installation.

No, this statement can't be correct. I'm pretty sure that the
"python3-distutils" package *was* available when Ubuntu 18.04 -- not
18.04.1 -- was originally released.

I've just downloaded


While the package is not on the ISO, a whole lot of *other* packages are
also not there -- for example I can't see any python at all. So I'm
thinking that python3-distutils was only available from the network.

But, I'm pretty sure python3-distutils *was* available from the network,
when 18.04 was originally released.

What was indeed broken in the original Ubuntu 18.04 release was the
meta-data on the "fdroidserver" package.

> But I think it's clear that distutils.util is not *3rd party* python
> library.

I agree; and that is what matters.

> I have tried that the command "sudo apt upgrade"  can't fix this bug

This "apt" command would only be relevant if you had the *old*
fdroidserver package installed (with the missing dependency in its
meta-data). Then, "apt" would install the *new* fdroidserver package for
you, and it would also act on the now-visible "python3-distutils"
dependency. Thus, "apt" would automatically install in
python3-distutils, as a dependency.

For installing "python3-distutils" *in itself*, the above "apt" command
is totally useless.

> while the command "sudo apt-get install python3-distutils" works.

Yes, it does, because here you are specifically requesting the
python3-distutils package.

And that's what matters. Ubuntu users simply need to install
python3-distutils manually, from their official package repositories, if
they want to use BaseTools (as part of the upstream edk2 git repo).

So I think this edk2 patch set is not necessary, after all.

edk2-devel mailing list

Reply via email to