On 02/27/19 14:44, Sami Mujawar wrote: > Hi Laszlo, > > The DynamicTablesPkg won't be in use until the corresponding edk2-platform > patches for Dynamic Tables are merged (at which point it would be a major > feature addition). > I think for now, I will hold on until the stable release is tagged.
Thank you for the info; that works fine too, in my opinion. Laszlo > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > Sent: 26 February 2019 11:06 AM > To: Sami Mujawar <sami.muja...@arm.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Cc: Stephanie Hughes-Fitt <stephanie.hughes-f...@arm.com>; Alexei Fedorov > <alexei.fedo...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v1 0/6] Revert DynamicTablesPkg: Framework updates > and fixes > > On 02/26/19 12:01, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 02/26/19 09:44, Sami Mujawar wrote: >>> Reverting this patch series as Soft Feature Freeze for >>> edk2-stable201903 started on 22 Feb 2019. >>> >>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: Alexei Fedorov <alexei.fedo...@arm.com> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 >>> Signed-off-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.muja...@arm.com> >>> >>> The changes can be seen at >>> https://github.com/samimujawar/edk2/tree/Revert_473_dynamic_tables_fr >>> amework_v1 >>> >>> Sami Mujawar (6): >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: Minor updates and fix typos" >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: Remove GIC Distributor Id field" >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: DGB2: Update DBG2_DEBUG_PORT_DDI" >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: Add OEM Info" >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: Rename enum used for ID Mapping" >>> Revert "DynamicTablesPkg: Fix protocol section" >>> >>> >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Drivers/DynamicTableFactoryDxe/DynamicTableFactoryDxe.inf >>> | 7 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Drivers/DynamicTableManagerDxe/DynamicTableManagerDxe.inf >>> | 7 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Include/ArmNameSpaceObjects.h >>> | 73 +++++--------------- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Include/Library/TableHelperLib.h >>> | 4 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Include/StandardNameSpaceObjects.h >>> | 18 ----- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiDbg2LibArm/Dbg2Generator.c >>> | 7 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiFadtLibArm/FadtGenerator.c >>> | 2 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiGtdtLibArm/GtdtGenerator.c >>> | 2 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiIortLibArm/IortGenerator.c >>> | 8 +-- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiMadtLibArm/MadtGenerator.c >>> | 6 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiMcfgLibArm/McfgGenerator.c >>> | 2 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSpcrLibArm/SpcrGenerator.c >>> | 2 +- >>> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Common/TableHelperLib/TableHelper.c >>> | 26 ++----- >>> 13 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Thank you. Sorry about the inconvenience. >> >> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >> >> Laszlo >> > > Note: if you have small individual patches that cleanly qualify as bugfixes, > especially for features introduced during this development cycle (since the > last table tag), those should be acceptable even during the hard feature > freeze. > > https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/HardFeatureFreeze > > So if you have fixes like that (possibly a subset of the present patch set), > I certainly encourage you to repost those. I'm not familiar with > DynamicTablesPkg, and so I can't evaluate this question myself, on a > patch-by-patch basis. It's also possible that you'll have to split out parts > of larger patches (refactor them) so that only the strict-sense fixes can be > posted and applied. > > Thanks! > Laszlo > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
