> -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 10:05 PM > To: Ni, Ray; Dong, Guo; edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Cc: Wu, Hao A; Kinney, Michael D; Ma, Maurice; David Woodhouse > Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Enhance UEFI payload for > coreboot and Slim Bootloader > > (+David) > > On 03/29/19 06:15, Ni, Ray wrote: > > > > Guo, > > Just to double confirm: UefiPayloadPkg will not require Legacy8254 timer > support. > > The old packages Coreboot*Pkgs will be removed. > > Which means now only QEMU/OVMF needs the Legacy8254 support. > > > > Laszlo, > > Now since QEMU/OVMF is the only consumer of the Legacy8254 driver, do > you > > agree that the Legacy8254 is moved to OvmfPkg? > > Note: We agreed that Legacy8259 will be moved to OvmfPkg/Csm directory > and > > that decision is not going to be changed by this new situation. > > The last status (up to & including comment 12) in > <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1496> was that: > > (1) 8254TimerDxe would remain a generic driver, with the minimal > interrupt controller programming that it needs flattened into it (no > dependency on gEfiLegacy8259ProtocolGuid) > > (2) the 8259InterruptControllerDxe driver (producing > gEfiLegacy8259ProtocolGuid) would move under OvmfPkg/Csm. > > Now, if 8254TimerDxe becomes specific to OvmfPkg, then I think it's not > necessary to modify it -- it can continue depending on > gEfiLegacy8259ProtocolGuid. Simply move both drivers from PcAtChipsetPkg > to OvmfPkg. (Note: *not* to OvmfPkg/Csm). > > Hao: can you please update > <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1496> accordingly? (If > you agree, that is.)
Sure. I will double confirm the latest direction and update the above BZ. Best Regards, Hao Wu > > Thanks > Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
