Feng -

Our compiler options are the same as yours for VS2008. Here is a small function 
which duplicates the problem.

Compile with:

cl /c /GL /O1b2is /Gy /GF /GS- x.c aa.c
link /DEBUG /LTCG /OPT:REF /OPT:ICF=10 /SECTION:.xdata,D /SECTION:.pdata,D 
/IGNORE:4254 /MERGE:.data=.text /MERGE:.rdata=.text x.obj aa.obj
dumpbin /disasm x.exe >output.txt

Here is the code generated for main:

main:
  00000001400076D0: 48 81 EC 98 00 00  sub         rsp,98h
                    00
  00000001400076D7: BA 4F 8B FE FF     mov         edx,0FFFE8B4Fh
  00000001400076DC: 33 C0              xor         eax,eax
  00000001400076DE: 38 02              cmp         byte ptr [rdx],al
  00000001400076E0: 74 18              je          00000001400076FA
  00000001400076E2: 48 FF C0           inc         rax
  00000001400076E5: 80 B8 4F 8B FE FF  cmp         byte ptr [rax-174B1h],0
                    00
  00000001400076EC: 75 F4              jne         00000001400076E2
  00000001400076EE: 83 F8 32           cmp         eax,32h
  00000001400076F1: 7E 07              jle         00000001400076FA
  00000001400076F3: B8 FB FF FF FF     mov         eax,0FFFFFFFBh
  00000001400076F8: EB 2A              jmp         0000000140007724
  00000001400076FA: 4C 8D 44 24 20     lea         r8,[rsp+20h]
  00000001400076FF: 0F BE 0A           movsx       ecx,byte ptr [rdx]
  0000000140007702: 48 FF C2           inc         rdx
  0000000140007705: 66 41 89 08        mov         word ptr [r8],cx
  0000000140007709: 4D 8D 40 02        lea         r8,[r8+2]
  000000014000770D: 84 C9              test        cl,cl
  000000014000770F: 75 EE              jne         00000001400076FF
  0000000140007711: 48 8D 54 24 20     lea         rdx,[rsp+20h]
  0000000140007716: 48 8D 0D DB FE FF  lea         
rcx,[??_C@_03NNECAHIM@?$CFS?6?$AA@]
                    FF
  000000014000771D: E8 22 00 00 00     call        printf
  0000000140007722: 33 C0              xor         eax,eax
  0000000140007724: 48 81 C4 98 00 00  add         rsp,98h
                    00
  000000014000772B: C3                 ret

From: Tian, Feng [mailto:feng.t...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:08 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] LTCG and fixed address pointers.

Hi, Tim

It's weird why I didn't meet your issue?

VariableDxe.c.patch is what I modified to emulate your case.

The pcd definition is updated to:
  ## 64-bit Base address of the NV variable range in flash device
  
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageVariableBase64|0xFFE00008|UINT64|0x80000001

The CC flag is:
  DEBUG_VS2008x86_X64_CC_FLAGS     = /nologo /c /WX /GS- /X /W4 /Gs32768 /D 
UNICODE /O1ib2s /GL /Gy /FIAutoGen.h /EHs-c- /GR- /GF /Gm
The Link flag is:
  DEBUG_VS2008x86_X64_DLINK_FLAGS  = /NOLOGO /NODEFAULTLIB /IGNORE:4001 
/OPT:REF /OPT:ICF=10 /MAP /ALIGN:32 /SECTION:.xdata,D /SECTION:.pdata,D 
/Machine:X64 /LTCG /DLL /ENTRY:$(IMAGE_ENTRY_POINT) 
/SUBSYSTEM:EFI_BOOT_SERVICE_DRIVER /SAFESEH:NO /BASE:0 /DRIVER /DEBUG

[From above build flag, we can know LTO feature is enabled as /GL and /LTCG has 
been used]

The output.txt is the disassembly file of "dmpbin.exe", in which line 26 ~28, I 
don't see the assembly code segment like you shown. (due to 512k mail size 
limitation, I have to trim some output in output.txt)

The disassembly code is:
  0000000000000A12: B8 08 01 E0 FF     mov         eax,0FFE00108h
  0000000000000A17: B9 08 00 E0 FF     mov         ecx,0FFE00008h
  0000000000000A1C: 80 38 00           cmp         byte ptr [rax],0

So what build flag are you using?

Thanks
Feng

From: Tim Lewis [mailto:tim.le...@insyde.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 09:30
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [edk2] LTCG and fixed address pointers.

To follow up further, the problem appears to be an encoding error:

The bytes for the encoding are below. The value of the PCD was 
0x00000000ffe8b00e

  0000000000063B24: 44 38 B0 0E B0 E8 FF cmp         byte ptr [rax-174FF2h],r14b

44 = extend the R field in the mod R/M byte.
38 = compare
B0 = modrm = [rax+disp32], and r = r14
Disp32 = ffe8b0038

Notice that the PCD value is encoded directly as a displacement. But, in 64-bit 
modes, displacements are sign-extended (see 2.2.1.3 in Vol 2 of the Intel Ref) 
to 64-bits, which means it acts, -effectively, like a subtraction. For an 
unsigned integer, it must be encoded with a register. In fact, a few 
instructions before, you can see:

  0000000000063B14: BA 0E B0 E8 FF     mov         edx,0FFE8B00Eh

So this would have been better encoded as cmp byte ptr [rax + rdx], r14b

Tim


From: Tim Lewis [mailto:tim.le...@insyde.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:41 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [edk2] LTCG and fixed address pointers.

We tried as a UINT64. Same result. Tim

From: Tian, Feng [mailto:feng.t...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:26 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [edk2] LTCG and fixed address pointers.

How about defining this Pcd as UINT64? We defined PcdPciExpressBaseAddress like 
this way.

So your code should be:

In Dec file:
  gXxxTokenSpaceGuid.PcdXxxAddress|0xFFe8B00E|UINT64|0x12345678

In C code:
  StrPtr = PcdGet64 (PcdXXX) + 0x100;

From: Tim Lewis [mailto:tim.le...@insyde.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 01:16
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [edk2] LTCG and fixed address pointers.

We are having trouble with link-time code generation under Visual Studio when 
using PCDs to specify a specific address and convert it to a pointer, when 
accessed from a library. In a library, the FixedAtBuild PCDs (on x64) are 
defned as extern const UINT32 PcdXXXX; and PcdXXXX contains 0xffe8b00e. The 
code generated by VS2008/2010/2012 linker shows:


xor         r12d,r12d         // r12d = 0

mov         eax,r12d          // eax = r12d == 0  rax = ?

cmp         byte ptr [rax-174FF2h],r12b

Notice LTCG is trying to optimize by using a relative offset from 0. "0 - 
174ff2" is FFFFFFFFFFE8B00E (not FFe8B00e).

The code in question is in the form:

CHAR8 *StrPtr;

StrPtr = (CHAR8 *)(UINTN) (PcdGet(PcdXXXX) + 0x100))
while (*StrPtr != '\0') {
...
}

We have tried nearly everything we can think of, other than turning off LTCG 
for the module or even the specific lines. I am worried about what happens with 
MMIO and other "fixed" addresses. I have tried (CHAR8 *)(UINTN) (UINT32)  and 
almost every possible combination of typecases on the PCD result and the 0x100, 
etc. Even did & 0xffffffff. No effect.

If I turn off LTCG, it correctly creates a 32-bit address.

I haven't been able to get any response on the MS forums.

Anyone have any experience with this?

Tim
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

typedef struct _y {
  void *k;
} y;

extern const unsigned __int32 x;

static
unsigned short *
BvdtLibAscii2Unicode (
  unsigned short         *UnicodeStr,
  char          *AsciiStr
  )
{
  unsigned short  *Str;

  Str = UnicodeStr;

  while (1) {
    *(UnicodeStr++) = (unsigned short) *AsciiStr;
    if (*(AsciiStr++) == '\0') {
      return Str;
    }
  }
}

int main()
{
  char *y;
  int i;
  unsigned short output[50];
  
  
  y = (char *)(unsigned __int64)(x + 0x41);

  i = TestLen(y);  

  
  if (i > 50) {
    return -5;
  } else {
    BvdtLibAscii2Unicode (output, y); 
  printf ("%S\n",output);
  }
  return 0;
}
const unsigned __int32 x = 0xFFFE8B0EUL;

const unsigned int PcdMaximumAsciiStringLength = 32000;

unsigned __int64 TestLen(char *y) 
{
  unsigned __int64 Length;
  
  for (Length = 0; *y != '\0'; y++, Length++) {
  }
  return Length;
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to