Dennis,
good observation. I hope I didn't leave the impression of starting off negative. The students very much enjoyed the debates and it gave them a perspective of the limits of science. I've taken Ford's quip as being somewhat tongue-in-cheek, and that's the way the stats is bunk quote was used in stats class.
thanx,
JR
>my view is that it would be better to start off positive ... not negative ...
>sure, as you go, point out the difficulties ... "discovering" "summarizing"
>knowledge is not easy ... but, there are things we CAN do ...
>
>stress what we can do ... with appropriate caveats of course
Jeff Rasmussen, PhD
"Welcome Home to Symynet"
Symynet http://www.symynet.com
Website Development
Eastern Philosophies Software
Quantitative Instructional Software
================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Re: Statistics is Bunk dennis roberts
- Re: Statistics is Bunk Jeff Rasmussen
- Re: Statistics is Bunk Eric Bohlman
- Re: Statistics is Bunk Jay Warner
- Re: Statistics is Bunk Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: Statistics is Bunk Richard A. Beldin
