Elliot Cramer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Alan McLean wrote:
>
> > The second sentence here ensures that generalisability to a population
> > IS an issue for statistics. And a big issue, usually overlooked.
> >
> It is not a statistical issue with a non-random sample; it is a matter of
> experimental judgement
If you mean it depends more on the design and the theoretical background of
the study then you are spot on, IMO. The contribution of statistics (relative
to other factors) to generalizability is small (but still important).
Thom
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inference W. D. Allen Sr.
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inferen... Vadim Marmer
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inferen... Elliot Cramer
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inf... dennis roberts
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical... Elliot Cramer
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statist... Alan McLean
- Re: Most Common Mistake In St... Elliot Cramer
- Re: Most Common Mistake I... Thom Baguley
- Re: Most Common Mista... Alan McLean
- Re: Most Common Mista... Herman Rubin
- Re: Random Sampling and External Valid... Karl L. Wuensch
- Re: Random Sampling and External V... dennis roberts
- Re: Random Sampling and Exter... Neil W. Henry
- Re: Random Sampling and E... dennis roberts
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inferen... Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inf... Herman Rubin
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inferen... Glen Barnett
- Re: Most Common Mistake In Statistical Inferen... Herman Rubin
