On 26 Mar 2001 19:12:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dianne Worth)
wrote:
> I have a regression model with (mostly) identifiable IVs. In addition,
> I want to examine another set of responses and have about 15-20
> questions that relate to that new 'factor.'
[ ... ]
There is just one factor to be defined?
And you have a set of proposed questions, just 15 or 20?
It seems like you should be able to look at your
correlation matrix, or unrotated PC analysis, or FA,
and drop the variables that are odd.
You add together the ones that are okay, and that's it.
Do you really need a second factor? Or more?
You might have to say why, before you figure out
which analysis to do, and how many factors to save.
--
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
