[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rodney Carr) writes:


 
> The problem I am having is that I'm not sure what estimating method
> to use. EQS implements a number of different methods (Maximum
> Likelihood, Least Squares, GLS, etc). Unfortunately they give quite
> different results. Actually, LS gives fit indices that are fairly
> high, but none of the others do (so I'd like to use the LS method!).
> But I can't find any references that explain which method should be
> used. Please, do you have any ideas for where I might look for
> advice?

Hi Rodney, try the following sources:

SEMNET forum at http://www.gsu.edu/~mkteer/semnet.html (they feature an
archive of previous discussions which is quite helpful)

@Book{chou-bentler95,
  booktitle =    {Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, 
                   and Applications},
  publisher =    {Sage},
  year =         1995,
  editor =       {Hoyle, Rick H.},
  address =      {Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi}
}


@Book{kline98,
  author =       {Kline, Rex B.},
  title =        {Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling},
  publisher =    {Guildford Press},
  year =         1998,
  address =      {New York, London}
}


@Article{hoogland-boomsma98,
  author =       {Hoogland, Jeffrey J. and Anne Boomsma},
  title =        {Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling},
  journal =      {Sociological Methods \& Research},
  year =         1998,
  volume =       26,
  pages =        {329-367}
}

@Book{garson98,
  author =       {Garson, David},
  title =        {Structural Equation Modeling},
  publisher =    {College of Humanities and Social Sciences, North
                  Carolina State University},
  year =         1998,
  address =      {\url{www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/structur.htm (13.11.00)}}
}


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to