Quite frankly Robert the details are proprietary. I suppose I could have
been more descriptive, but I don't see what the shape of my distribution
have to do with what it represents. I have received several email replies
with various recommendations. I'll add transforming to the list. Not being
a statistician by trade, the little hints I have received should provide a
good starting point at the library. Thanks again
-dnult
Robert Dawson wrote in message
<05c501bf5b6f$c3448b90$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>: Dave Nulton wrote:
>
>
<snip>
> (1) I and others have said on various occasions: please, if you're
>asking for advice about a data set, tell people what it is. I'm not
>entirely sure that I understand the psychology of this practice, but the
>result is akin to going to the dentist and refusing to open your mouth.
>
> (2) Try transforming. I don't know if this is good advice or not - see
>(1).
>
> -Robert Dawson
>
>
>
>
>
