On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:09:53 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thanks for the replies. It was the difference between the adjusted R2
>calculations that I was concerened about. I have also tried the
>calculations in SAS JMP and that does not output R2 or adj R2 for
>regressions without a constant term. Maybe this is a more appropriate
>thing to do as it avoids the confusion with interpretation you guys
>have brought to my attention.
You might find this interesting:
Kvalseth, T. O. (1985). �Cautionary note about R^2.� American
Statistician 39: 279-285.
--
Mike Prager
NOAA, Beaufort, NC
Standard disclaimers:
* Opinions expressed are personal and not represented otherwise.
* Any use of tradenames does not constitute a NOAA endorsement.
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.
For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================
