In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald F. Burrill) wrote:
> Why would one wish to avoid multiple linear regression, which is so
much
> more convenient than the sequence of simple linear regressions
alluded to
> below?  Two possible reasons occur to mind:
>  (1) for the challenge of finding out how to do it (in which case I
> wouldn't want to spoil your fun!);
>  (2) this is an assigned homework problem (in which case it would be
a
> shame to spoil your instructor's intent).

Third possible reason:

I am a lowly computer programmer who has only one recipe for making
multiple linear regressions in SQL: via a sequence of simple ones. This
is my aforementioned schedule is so important: it is an algorithm. Aha!
I'm found out!

>

> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am told that I can solve for these three unknowns (B1, B2 and B3)
by
> > doing simple linear regression to obtain "residuals"; from the
> > residuals come the unknowns. For example, I know that with just two
> > unknowns (B1 and B2) in:
> >
> >     y = B0 + B1 * x1 + B2 * x2 + e          [1]
> >
> > I can obtain B1 after the following schedule of calculations:
> >
> >     regress y on x2 which yields R1 (residual one)
> >     regress x1 on x2 which yields R2
> >     regress R1 on R2 which leads to a slope value that is B1
> >
> > Now the pitiful questions: how do I get B2?
>
>       Same way you got B1.
>

Yes, but what happens when you have three independent variables: x1, x2
and x3? I am afraid that I will have to regress in all possible
combinations of x1, x2 and x3. So my little schedule would be quite
large right?

I hope this is not the task at hand:

y on x1 ---> Ryx1
x2 on x1 ---> Rx2x1
Ryx1 on Rx2x1 ---> (?)

y on x1 ---> Ryx1
x3 on x1 ---> Rx3x1
Ryx1 on Rx3x1 ---> (?)

y on x2 ---> Ryx2
x1 on x2 ---> Rx1x2
Ryx2 on Rx1x2 ---> (?)

y on x2 ---> Ryx2
x3 on x2 ---> Rx3x2
Ryx2 on Rx3x2 ---> (?)

y on x3 ---> Ryx3
x1 on x3 ---> Rx1x3
Ryx3 on Rx1x3 ---> (?)

y on x3 ---> Ryx3
x1 on x2 ---> Rx1x2
Ryx3 on Rx1x2 ---> (?)

If this is absurd please tell me WHY it is.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.


===========================================================================
  This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
  for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
  or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
  offensive email.

  For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================

Reply via email to