In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Radford Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The following is a question posed by a faculty member in the social
>>sciences. He has done a logistic regression finding near significance.
>>But his Betas are zero. What does this mean? Is it just that the accuracy
>>is only to three places? His output table is below.
>
>If I'm reading the output below correctly, the p-value for the test
>of the null hypothesis that the beta is zero is 1.000.
After getting e-mail from Rich Ulrich, I now think that I *am* reading
the output wrong. As he says in his post, perhaps the scales of the
variables are just extremely large, leading naturally to extremely
small coefficients.
Radford Neal
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.
For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================
