I have no doubt that they are world renown experts. I did
not meant to be offensive. Excuse me if I was.
But I still want to say that the title "Modern Regression
and Classification" is a bit too pretentious and misleading.
Yes, they are experts, but they are experts in what could be
called flexible-functional-form estimation or nonparameric
estimation, which is _not_ all modern regression and
classification.
Alexander Tsyplakov
P.G.Hamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
>
> > I have several questions.
> >
> > Is it possible to "give a detailed overview of
statistical
> > models for regression and classification" in two-day
course?
> >
> > What do you mean by "Modern Regression and
Classification"?
> > May be it's better to call this "Some Methods in
Regression
> > and Classification (in which we feel ourselves
experts)"?
> >
> > And the last, isn't this message similar to spam?
> >
>
> Ease up, these people are world renown experts on modern
> approaches to regression and classification problems,
having
> played major roles in their development.
>
> Have a look at some of their papers:
> http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~hastie/
> http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/
>
> Peter
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
