My Rsquare is 0.99834 and Adj R square is 0.99377
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (I am just addressing a single point.)
> On 30 Sep 2000 14:06:59 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Burrill)
> wrote:
>
> < concerning >
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> < snip, most >
> > > My adjusted R square is also very close to R Square.
>
> DB>
> > As is natural for R very close to 1.
>
> - but how close is "very close"? I don't think it can be,
> with 30/31 as the R-squared expected by chance.
>
> Using the adjusted R-squared formula in Cohen and Cohen,
> the distance from 1.0 will be 30 times as big as the observed,
> so that .9954 will be shrunk to .86. Assuming that you do start
> with the full number of variables in the equation, as is usually
> recommended. But you still get "a lot" of shrinkage by my
> book, even if you say the error is (say) only 10 times as
> big as the observed error of 0.0046.
>
> --
> Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
