"Gaj Vidmar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there seems to be no word from professional statisticians yet, so here's an
> addenum.
This message was posted in many places, so presumably we will get a
summary of responses if we care?
My own suggestion (mangled by a bad emailer) was to use vector time
series methods, but this could lead to a fairly large computation
probelm without extra information. I wasn't able to recommend a very
good specialist reference off the top of my head, though.
MJR
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
