Jon Cryer wrote:

> This is quite a silly problem. No wonder statistics (for business)
> gets so little respect. This is time series or process data--not a random
> sample
> from some fixed population. There is no information about the stability
> of the process over time. Very few business processes are stable over five
> years.
> Why can't we teach meaningful statistics?
>

But suppose there is   a little bit sense in the problem described. Is my
solution correct or wrong?

Thanks in advance

Jan

>
> Jon Cryer
>
> At 05:14 PM 12/13/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >I have some difficulties with following problem
> >(I need the solution urgently for tomorrow):
> >
> >Production levels for Giles Fashion vary greatly according to consumer
> >acceptance of the latest styles. Therefore, the company's
> >weekly orders of wool cloth are difficult
> >to predict in advance. On the basis of 5 years data, the following
> >probability distribution for the company's weekly demand for wool
> >has been computed:
> >
> >Amount of wool (lb)     Probability
> >2500                        0.30
> >3500                        0.45
> >4500                        0.20
> >5500                        0.05
> >
> >>From these data, the raw-materials purchaser computed the
> >expected number of pounds required. Recently, she noticed
> >that the company's sales were lower in the last year than in years
> >before.
> >Extrapolating, she observed that the company will be lucky
> >if its weekly demand averages 2,500 this year.
> >
> >(a) What was the expected weekly demand for wool based
> >on the distribution from past data?
> >
> >(b) If each pound of wool generates $5 in revenue and costs $4 to
> >purchase, ship, and handle, how much would Giles Fashion stand
> >to gain or lose each week if it orders wool based on the past
> >expected value and company's demand is only 2,500?
> >
> >(End of the text of the problem.)
> >
> >Possible solution (in my opinion):
> >
> >I.
> >(a) I fink is obvious: If X means company's weekly demand for wool
> >(lb), then the expected weekly demand for wool based  on the
> >distribution from past data =E(X) =
> >0.3*2500+0.45*3500+0.20*4500+0.05*5500=
> >= 3500. Am I right?
> >
> >(b)
> >Actually I am not sure what company's weekly demand for
> >wool in the past data (table of probability distr.) means.
> >It is the amount of wool which company bought weekly
> >or is the amount of wool which company sold (in it's products)
> >weekly?
> >The last sentence make difference between
> >company's orders (it orders wool based...) and company's demand
> >( and company's demand is only 2,500)
> >(I think but I am not sure, it's actually company's weekly demand for
> >wool).
> >So In my opinion company's weekly demand for wool means:
> >the amount of wool which company sold (in it's products) weekly?
> >Am I right?
> >
> >I am not sure what the last sentence means.
> >Does it mean that the company orders weekly
> >3500 lb of wool ( it orders wool based on the past
> >expected value and  the past expected value = 3500 from (a))
> >and it sells weekly 2500 lb in their products
> >(and company's demand is only 2,500)?
> > If so the solution seems to be:
> >The company should expect to gain weekly: 2500*1$-1000*4$=-1500$
> >so in fact it should expect to lose weekly 1500$.
> >--
> >
> >Am I right?
> >
> >Maybe I should consider that the company's weekly demand
> >is 2500 lb but it orders are:
> >
> >Amount of wool (lb)     Probability
> >2500                        0.30
> >3500                        0.45
> >4500                        0.20
> >5500                        0.05
> >
> >(Loss | Orders=2500 )   0$      -1500$  ...
> >probability             0.30     0.45
> >
> >E(Loss | Orders=2500 ) = 0*0.3+(-1500)*0.45+ ...
> >
> >
> >Please somebody correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >
> >
> >=================================================================
> >Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
> >the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
> >                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
> >=================================================================
> >
> >
>                                                  ___________
> ----------------------------------------------- |           \
> Jon Cryer, Professor     [EMAIL PROTECTED]   (             )
> Dept. of Statistics  www.stat.uiowa.edu/~jcryer \            \_University
>  and Actuarial Science   office 319-335-0819     \         *   \of Iowa
> The University of Iowa   dept.  319-335-0706      \            /Hawkeyes
> Iowa City, IA 52242      FAX    319-335-3017       |__________ )
> -----------------------------------------------               V
>
> =================================================================
> Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
> the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
>                   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
> =================================================================



=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to