On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:48:21 GMT, Gene Gallagher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be unwise to use random sampling theory, with or
> without the finite population correction, to infer what the percentage
> of Bush and Gore votes would be among the non-machine counted votes.
> There were several analyses published in the press about who would
> have won a recount, based on the recounts in Broward, Palm Beach and
> Miami-Dade county. All of these models presented in the press
> predicted Bush would have won a state-wide recount. These models appear
> to have assumed that the uncounted votes were randomly drawn from the
[ snip, rest ]
Bush would have?
- I assume that is a typo.
Or you read a weird press?
--
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
