Amen to that. the 'problems' that Excel has with statistics seems to appear with various types of regression on less-than-well-cornformed data. any regression analysis deserves as many tests of 'legitimacy,' robustness etc. as you can give it. SPSS is one way to get a heck of a lot more such tests than Excel.
"Arthur J. Kendall" wrote: > > SPSS is extremely user friendly, numerically stable, widely available, etc. > > If I were you, I would rerun the whole analysis in SPSS. Statistics in Excel > are widely known to have problems. > > Maja wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm working on some questions where I have to run several regressions and > > I'm using excel. Now I have to do auxiliary regressions, but it looks as if > > I couldn't do that on excel. Does anyone know if it is possible to do > > auxiliary regressions on excel and if not which program is the best?? > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Marijana > > . > . > ================================================================= > Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the > problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: > . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . > ================================================================= -- Jay Warner Principal Scientist Warner Consulting, Inc. 4444 North Green Bay Road Racine, WI 53404-1216 USA Ph: (262) 634-9100 FAX: (262) 681-1133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.a2q.com The A2Q Method (tm) -- What do you want to improve today? . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
